On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 08:18:05AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > It looks like that aio_funcs.c does not need lock.h (reported by > include-what-you-use). > If we remove its direct include, it's still indirectly included through proc.h > though. But I think that removing its direct include makes sense as it's not > needed at all. > > If we still need to discuss about those lock.h related changes, maybe it's > worth creating a dedicated thread?
This patch set is related to an entirely different topic than what we are discussing, so yes, a different thread would be adapted. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
