On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 5:01 PM Amul Sul <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 2:18 AM Zsolt Parragi <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > Path is ignored with a positional argument, I think this is a bug?
> >
> > This fails:
> >
> > pg_waldump --path /wal/dir 000000010000000000000001
> >
> > And this works:
> >
> > pg_waldump --path /wal/dir --start 0/01000028 --end 0/010020F8
> >
>
> Good catch! I've fixed this in the attached version and updated a test
> case to cover this scenario.
>
> > +{
> > + int fname_len = strlen(fname);
> > +
> >
> > Shouldn't this use size_t?
> >
>
> Okay, that can be used. I’ve done the same in the attached version.
>
> > + /*
> > + * Setup temporary directory to store WAL segments and set up an exit
> > + * callback to remove it upon completion.
> > + */
> > + setup_tmpwal_dir(waldir);
> >
> > Maybe this could be deferred to be created only on first use? If I
> > understand correctly, in a typical scenario waldump won't use this
> > temporary directory, yet it always creates it.
>
> Yeah, that optimization can be done, but passing the waldir  -- which
> is only used once -- to the point where the first temp file is created
> would require quite a bit of code refactoring that doesn't seem to
> offer much gain, IMO.
>

Since Andrew also leans toward creating the directory only when
needed, I have reconsidered the approach. I think we can pass waldir
(the archive directory) via XLogDumpPrivate, and I’ve implemented that
in the attached version.

Regards,
Amul

Attachment: v22-0001-Move-tar-detection-and-compression-logic-to-comm.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: v22-0002-pg_waldump-Preparatory-refactoring-for-tar-archi.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: v22-0003-pg_waldump-Add-support-for-reading-WAL-from-tar-.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: v22-0004-pg_verifybackup-Enable-WAL-parsing-for-tar-forma.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to