Chao Li <[email protected]> writes: > Overall, this looks like a solid patch to me.
Thanks for taking another look.
> The only thing I noticed is that while 0002 fixes the tuple-counting issue,
> there does not seem to be a test that would fail without it. So I think it
> would be better to add a test case for 0002. I tried doing that and attached
> a diff. Without 0002, the test fails; with 0002, it passes.
I couldn't get excited about expending test cycles on that.
regards, tom lane
