On Thursday, August 7, 2025, Dominique Devienne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What's not nice is in the way it failed IMHO. I guess I persist it's > not a user friendly message :)
Then write the error message you would have liked to see. > > Can you overload a function solely by changing an argument name? No, the signature is only the name and input argument types. > If not, as I suspect, then function lookup doesn't strictly depend on > argument names (like in C++). > So the function did exist, with the correct "signature" (ignoring > argument names). > And I was "just" using the wrong arg-name. That tripped me up. How is it “just” an argument name when you are using named argument syntax? David J.
