> "NFS" is a key word that does not inspire confidence in PostgreSQL circles...
Coming back to this, I just implemented 9P, which should translates to proper semantics for FSYNC. mount -t 9p -o trans=tcp,port=5564,version=9p2000.L,msize=65536,access=user 127.0.0.1 /mnt/9p Best, Pierre On Fri, Jul 18, 2025, at 06:40, Laurenz Albe wrote: > On Fri, 2025-07-18 at 00:57 +0200, Pierre Barre wrote: >> Looking forward to your feedback and questions! > > I think the biggest hurdle you will have to overcome is to > convince notoriously paranoid DBAs that this tall stack > provides reliable service, honors fsync() etc. > > Performance is great, but it is not everything. If things > perform surprisingly well, people become suspicious. > >> P.S. The full project includes a custom NFS filesystem too. > > "NFS" is a key word that does not inspire confidence in > PostgreSQL circles... > > Yours, > Laurenz Albe
