On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 2:20 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Rob Sargent <robjsarg...@gmail.com> writes:
> > I'm about to unleash new versions of the above and related functions
> > (args will change), so a drops are imminent. Any reason to hold off on
> that?
>
> While I've not yet looked at the code, I've got no reason to think
> this is anything except fragile argument parsing in \df and \sf.
>
>
I'm unsure about the "extra argument ignored" bit but the rest of "not
found" issues are due to operator error; specifying a pattern that tries to
match the name and arguments at the same time when that isn't how the
meta-command is defined to be used.

David J.

Reply via email to