On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 2:20 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Rob Sargent <robjsarg...@gmail.com> writes: > > I'm about to unleash new versions of the above and related functions > > (args will change), so a drops are imminent. Any reason to hold off on > that? > > While I've not yet looked at the code, I've got no reason to think > this is anything except fragile argument parsing in \df and \sf. > > I'm unsure about the "extra argument ignored" bit but the rest of "not found" issues are due to operator error; specifying a pattern that tries to match the name and arguments at the same time when that isn't how the meta-command is defined to be used.
David J.
