2021年2月7日(日) 4:07 Gabriel Martin <grafik.mu...@gmail.com>: > Hello, > > I know that since the launch of pgAdmin 4 in 2016, pgAdmin has been using > a web-based model, as announced as early as 2014. You only need to do a > little research on the Web to understand all the reasons behind this > choice, which I do not seek to question. > > However, I wonder if it would be relevant to keep pgAdmin 3 alive. I'm not > so much talking about improving the interface of pgAdmin 3, but simply > about keeping the software functional in new systems. I tried to install it > in the latest versions of Linux Mint and Ubuntu, but the software keeps > bugging, which it didn't do in older versions of the same systems 5 or 6 > years ago. > > Do you think there's a possibility that people could fix pgAdmin 3, even > if it means making a fork or whatever? Because, although pgAdmin 4 and > other tools such as OmniDB and DBeaver are probably excellent, some people, > for various reasons, might want to continue using pgAdmin 3 in 2021. I'm > not an expert in the field, but I'm thinking that maybe someone here might > be able to save this nice little application software from disappearing by > investing a few days to maintain it. >
FWIW there is a fork here which is making some attempt to keep it up-to-date with recent PostgreSQL versions: https://github.com/AbdulYadi/pgadmin3 Regards Ian Barwick -- EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com