Fix incorrect logic for hashed IN / NOT IN with non-strict operators

ExecEvalHashedScalarArrayOp(), when using a strict equality function,
performs a short-circuit when looking up NULL values.  When the function
is non-strict, the code incorrectly looked up the hash table for a
zero-valued Datum, which could have resulted in an accidental true
return if the hash table contained zero valued Datum, or could result
in a crash for non-byval types.

Here we fix this by adding an extra step when we build the hash table to
check what the result of a NULL lookup would be.  This requires looping
over the array and checking what the non-hashed version of the code
would do.  We cache the results of that in the expression so that we can
reuse the result any time we're asked to search for a NULL value.

It's important to note that non-strict equality functions are free to
treat any NULL value as equal to any non-NULL value.  For example,
someone may wish to design a type that treats an empty string and NULL
as equal.

All built-in types have strict equality functions, so this could affect
custom / user-defined types.

Author: Chengpeng Yan <[email protected]>
Author: David Rowley <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: ChangAo Chen <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 14

Branch
------
REL_14_STABLE

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/109de35b705cac265185459ae947eb72810c3a82

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/executor/execExprInterp.c     | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
src/include/executor/execExpr.h           |   4 ++
src/test/regress/expected/expressions.out | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/test/regress/sql/expressions.sql      |  70 ++++++++++++++++--
4 files changed, 253 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

Reply via email to