You haven't answered my question. Where (conceptually) and for what purpose
do you want to use the L2 norm.
1) displaying norms to observe the convergence behavior
2) in the convergence testing to determine when to stop
3) changing the "inner product" in the algorithm which amounts to
preconditioning.
Barry
> On Jun 12, 2025, at 9:42 AM, Ali ALI AHMAD <ali.ali_ah...@utt.fr> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your answer.
>
> I am currently working with the nonlinear solvers newtonls (with bt, l2,
> etc.) and newtontr (using newton, cauchy, and dogleg strategies) combined
> with the linear solver gmres and the ILU preconditioner, since my Jacobian
> matrix is nonsymmetric.
>
> I also use the Eisenstat-Walker method for newtonls, as my initial guess is
> often very far from the exact solution.
>
> What I would like to do now is to replace the standard Euclidean L2 norm with
> the L2 norm in the Lebesgue sense in the above numerical algorithm, because
> my problem is defined on an unstructured, anisotropic triangular mesh where a
> weighted norm would be more physically appropriate.
>
> Would you be able to advise me on how to implement this change properly?
>
> I would deeply appreciate any guidance or suggestions you could provide.
>
> Thank you in advance for your help.
>
> Best regards,
> Ali ALI AHMAD
>
> De: "Ali ALI AHMAD" <ali.ali_ah...@utt.fr>
> À: "Barry Smith" <bsm...@petsc.dev>
> Cc: "petsc-users" <petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov>, "petsc-maint"
> <petsc-ma...@mcs.anl.gov>
> Envoyé: Jeudi 12 Juin 2025 15:28:02
> Objet: Re: [petsc-maint] norm L2 problemQuestion about changing the norm used
> in nonlinear solvers (L2 Euclidean vs. L2 Lebesgue)
>
> Thank you for your answer.
>
> I am currently working with the nonlinear solvers newtonls (with bt, l2,
> etc.) and newtontr (using newton, cauchy, and dogleg strategies) combined
> with the linear solver gmres and the ILU preconditioner, since my Jacobian
> matrix is nonsymmetric.
>
> I also use the Eisenstat-Walker method for newtonls, as my initial guess is
> often very far from the exact solution.
>
> What I would like to do now is to replace the standard Euclidean L2 norm with
> the L2 norm in the Lebesgue sense, because my problem is defined on an
> unstructured, anisotropic triangular mesh where a weighted norm would be more
> physically appropriate.
>
> Would you be able to advise me on how to implement this change properly?
>
> I would deeply appreciate any guidance or suggestions you could provide.
>
> Thank you in advance for your help.
>
> Best regards,
> Ali ALI AHMAD
> De: "Barry Smith" <bsm...@petsc.dev>
> À: "Ali ALI AHMAD" <ali.ali_ah...@utt.fr>
> Cc: "petsc-users" <petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov>, "petsc-maint"
> <petsc-ma...@mcs.anl.gov>
> Envoyé: Jeudi 12 Juin 2025 14:57:40
> Objet: Re: [petsc-maint] norm L2 problemQuestion about changing the norm used
> in nonlinear solvers (L2 Euclidean vs. L2 Lebesgue)
>
> Do you wish to use a different norm
>
> 1) ONLY for displaying (printing out) the residual norms to track progress
>
> 2) in the convergence testing
>
> 3) to change the numerical algorithm (for example using the L2 inner
> product instead of the usual linear algebra R^N l2 inner product).
>
> For 1) use SNESMonitorSet() and in your monitor function use
> SNESGetSolution() to grab the solution and then VecGetArray(). Now you can
> compute any weighted norm you want on the solution.
>
> For 2) similar but you need to use SNESSetConvergenceTest
>
> For 3) yes, but you need to ask us specifically.
>
> Barry
>
>
> On Jun 11, 2025, at 4:45 AM, Ali ALI AHMAD <ali.ali_ah...@utt.fr> wrote:
>
> Dear PETSc team,
>
> I hope this message finds you well.
>
> I am currently using PETSc in a C++, where I rely on the nonlinear solvers
> `SNES` with either `newtonls` or `newtontr` methods. I would like to ask if
> it is possible to change the default norm used (typically the L2 Euclidean
> norm) to a custom norm, specifically the L2 norm in the sense of Lebesgue
> (e.g., involving cell-wise weighted integrals over the domain).
>
> My main goal is to define a custom residual norm that better reflects the
> physical quantities of interest in my simulation.
>
> Would this be feasible within the PETSc framework? If so, could you point me
> to the recommended approach (e.g., redefining the norm manually, using
> specific PETSc hooks or options)?
>
> Thank you very much in advance for your help and for the great work on PETSc!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ali ALI AHMAD
> PhD Student
> University of Technology of Troyes - UTT - France
> GAMMA3 Project - Office H008 - Phone No: +33 7 67 44 68 18
> 12 rue Marie Curie - CS 42060 10004 TROYES Cedex
>
