On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 06:15:56PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> Unfortunately, the tentative fix to the regression of fvextra has
> failed to convince the maintainer [1] and fvextra v1.14.0 was
> released with the regression unresolved [2].
>
> Extend the buggy range of fvextra.
>
> Link: https://github.com/gpoore/fvextra/issues/32#issuecomment-3942491507 [1]
> Link: https://github.com/gpoore/fvextra/releases/tag/v1.14.0 [2]
> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <[email protected]>
> ---
> Looks like Archlinux's texlive-latexextra (2026.0-3) comes with
> fvextra.sty v1.14.0.
Rather annoying, I will admit. But I am glad that you have a workaround!
Thank you very much, queued and pushed.
Thanx, Paul
> --
> utilities/autodate.sh | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/utilities/autodate.sh b/utilities/autodate.sh
> index 839db7f3..c72194fa 100644
> --- a/utilities/autodate.sh
> +++ b/utilities/autodate.sh
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ fi
>
> # check if fvextra is buggy ("samepage=true")
> FVEXTRA_BUGGY_SINCE=v1.11.0
> -FVEXTRA_BUGGY_UNTIL=v1.13.2
> +FVEXTRA_BUGGY_UNTIL=v1.14.0 # as of 2026/02/25
>
> fvextra_sty=`kpsewhich fvextra.sty`
> if [ "x$fvextra_sty" != "x" ] ; then
>
> base-commit: 492e8f9483d3e1dfd3768ef43dd462dd78e40c3b
> --
> 2.43.0
>
