On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:23:59AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Current master at commit b8bdf71fbc31 ("glossary: Add definitions of the
> flavors of multi-copy atomic") has new definitions of:
>
> - Multi-Copy Atomic
> - Non-Multi-Copy Atomic
> - Other Multi-Copy Atomic
>
> Not a big deal, but do you mind if I changed the latter to
> "Other-Multi-Copy Atomic"?
>
> I'm asking because the Index pages now have these terms:
>
> - Multi-copy atomic
> - Multicopy atomicity
> - full
> - non-
> - other-
> - Non-multi-copy atomic
> - Other multi-copy atomic
>
> , which look fairly inconsistent. :-/
>
> I think you want to say "Multi-Copy Atomic" in the glossary,
> and I can tweak index markers so that above terms can be listed
> simply as:
>
> - Multi-copy atomic
> - non-
> - other-
>
> , and in single level indexing mode:
>
> - Multi-copy atomic
> - Non-multi-copy atomic
> - other-multi-copy atomic
>
> , where "full(y) multi-copy atomic" is merged into plain
> "Multi-copy atomic".
>
> Do they look acceptable to you?
Other than wanting "other" in "other-multi-copy atomic" to be capitalized
in single level indexing mode, looks good to me! Thank you for checking,
and apologies for the hassle. (I should have generated the index...)
Thanx, Paul
