Yury,

Do you have any code repositories or papers or technical reports that
describe your method?

Best Regards,

Peter Goodman,
http://www.petergoodman.me
65 High Park Ave. APT 413,
Toronto, Ontario
M6P 2R7



On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Yury Euceda <[email protected]> wrote:
> No,
> It's another way. And it can handle with rules like:
> S -> (a)* a
> as you can see, this rule is not recursive, but it will fails with the
> string 'a'
>
> ________________________________
> From: Alex Repain <[email protected]>
> To: Yury Euceda <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sérgio Medeiros <[email protected]>; Bryan Ford <[email protected]>;
> peg lista <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 4:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [PEG] Fun with left recursion
>
>
>
> 2011/10/10 Yury Euceda <[email protected]>
>
> Hello!
> I developed a PEG that supports left (direct indirect hidden) recursion,
> right recursion, both (left and right) recursion,  generating a linear
> algorithm for these tasks.
> Capable of assist in FRONT END compiler development (syntactical, lexical,
> semantical analysis)
> And you're going to be able to generate morphing computer algorithms like
> katadhin.
>
> There are many powerful characteristics and those issues below are covered
> and many more for example, rules like:
> S -> S a | S S | S S S | b
> with linear parsing time!!!!!
>
> Out of curiosity, is it using packrat parsing-style memoization to guarantee
> such linear time ?
>
> Somebody knows someone who's interested in this matter?
>
> Regarding the left recursion support, I think the main problem is that it is
> unspecified up to now, how PEGs should behave when supporting
> left-recursion.  If your parser is good for practical use, and that the way
> left-recursion behaves is widely accepted, I'd say a lot of us will be
> interested.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sérgio Medeiros <[email protected]>
> To: Bryan Ford <[email protected]>; peg lista <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 11:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [PEG] Fun with left recursion
>
>> First, a trivially evil left-recursive grammar:
>
>
>> S <- S
>
>> For example, does your parser detect and reject this somehow, or does it
>> behave the same as 'S <- f'?  (I hope it doesn't result in an infinite loop
>> at runtime anyway. :) )
>
> The same as 'S <- f'.
>
>
>> Now a grammar that's weird, not necessarily evil, in a slightly more
>> subtle way:
>
>> S <- S / a
>
>> Does this behave the same as 'S <- a', or do something else?  How should
>> it behave?
>
> The same as 'S <- a'.
>
>> Cranking up the evilness factor one notch with a mutually left-recursive
>> grammar…
>
>> S <- T / a
>> T <- S / &a
>
>> Given the input string "a", does this behave the same as 'S <- a'
>> (succeeding and consuming) or the same as 'S <- &a' (succeeding but
>> consuming no input)?  Do S and T
>> behave the same way or differently?  Should they?
>
> The same as 'S <- &a'.
>
>> Now, another grammar that's not necessarily evil but strange in a slightly
>> different way:
>
>> S <- Saa / a /
>
>> Given the input string 'aaaa', for example, does/should this grammar
>> consume just 3 or all 4 a's, or does it do something else?  What should it
>> do?
>
> It consumes just 3 a's.
> The general behavior is like this:
>   * If the input has 2n a's, then 2n-1 a's are matched.
>   * If the input has 2n+1 a's, then 2n+1 a's are matched.
>
> Sérgio
>
> _______________________________________________
> PEG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csail.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/peg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PEG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csail.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/peg
>
>
>
>
> --
> Alex REPAIN
> ENSEIRB-MATMECA - student
> TECHNICOLOR R&D - intern
> BORDEAUX I      - master's student
> SCALA           - enthusiast
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PEG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csail.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/peg
>
>

_______________________________________________
PEG mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csail.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/peg

Reply via email to