Yes! This worked as expected. I assumed it was a designed choice, and it seemed it was. Thank you Bert and Roman for these quick answers.
Oscar Koeroo > On 31 May 2020, at 12:14, bert hubert <bert.hub...@powerdns.com> wrote: > > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 12:08:36PM +0200, Oscar Koeroo via Pdns-users wrote: > >> I’m using the following LUA script to intercept, but I don’t understand >> the results. Why doesn’t the dig get the CNAME to got to the A record I >> have in my domain.local zone? I expected dig to try to get the CNAME >> value of qr.domain.net and the CNAME value of that result, which seems to >> halt there. > > Hi Oscar! > > So firstly, a resolver is expected to provide a complete answer. If it > supplies only a CNAME, a client can assume there is nothing more. A > stub-resolver won't itself recurse. > >> The expected result I was looking for was: > > The good news is, we thought of this scenario, and we have this: > > "CNAME chain resolution > > It may be useful to return a CNAME record for Lua, and then have the > PowerDNS Recursor continue resolving that CNAME. This can be achieved by > setting dq.followupFunction to followCNAMERecords and dq.followupDomain to > “www.powerdns.com”. PowerDNS will do the rest. " > > https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/lua-scripting/hooks.html#cname-chain-resolution > > Good luck! > > Bert _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
