I agree Rob, and Rob <g> I'm interested, I'm looking into the techs here to hear what they have to say about the Ltds., build, optics, looks, design, cost-relation. But of course after all this chat, I'd like to put one on my MZ-S and try it, shoot a roll of Provia 100 F. Other than the FA 50mm f/1.4 I have nothing similar to compare it to, unless you think the FA 100mm f/2.8 Macro as a normal lens would help? Thoughts? Of course, we could figure this all out and I'll never find a place that stocks one, and I have zero camera friends here to help. Any of my buddies ideas of photography is hire a pro, borrow me, or buy a disposable. :/
Brad. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:39 PM Subject: RE: 28-105 vs 24-90 vs 35-105 > On 21 Nov 2002 at 0:22, Rob Brigham wrote: > > > I don't know how to educate people that think like this. It is not a > > question of being demanding, but of seeing the proof of the pudding. > > Unfortunately Pentax marketing precludes this experience from many. > > Once you've spent a little time here (PDML) you learn to listen to many posters > opinions, they are often far more valuable than any published review or > independent MTF tests. IOW the closest thing to hands on testing with out the > feel of cold metal <VBG> in your hands. > > Cheers, > > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html >
