The FA 100/3.5 it is! I don't have any true macro lenses, and it can't feel any worse than a Nikon AF50/1.8.
BR > -----Original Message----- > From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 12:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: dslr > > > Nope, just AF500FTZ's. > > I'd be willing to part with my FA 100/3.5, which is of comparable > value to a functional Program Plus, I guess. I've also got a set of > extension tubes and a Pentax macro rail I never use. There's an A > 50/1.4 in the gear case too. > > Of course, the 100/3.5 may be the cheapest, worst-built prime ever put > out by Pentax - I'm sure we'd never hear the end of it... > > tv >
