OK guys and gals, go shoot some Kodachrome, get it developed, and look at it 
on the light table. You will all feel better as you wait to see what Pentax 
has up it's  sleeve.

Robert

Remember, Canon and Nikon lose money on their digital cameras(how the heck 
do they stay in business anyway??).

>
> > My biggest problem is not that I need a DSLR but
> > that Pentax will suffer
> > so much financially that it might have to go the
> > Olympus rote and just
> > stop making SLR's altogether, and instead make their
> > money on P&S cameras.
>
>more likely, they would suffer financially if they *did* produce a dslr.
>besides, many have pointed out (and i also agree with that) that it may 
>very
>well be that dslr is not The Way, so why waste tons of r&d resources now on 
>a
>potentially loosing technology? a new flagship slr or a bunch of top notch
>lenses would more likely to win them new customers as well as good 
>publicity.
>speaking for myself, i would definitely pass a $5K whizz bang gadget that 
>takes
>worse pictures than any $100 p&s, but would seriously consider $1K slr that 
>had
>USM, IS etc. and i suspect, i am not the only one.
>
> > By the way, my spell checker keeps trying to
> > replace "Photokina"  with "Fettuccini".
>
>makes sense to me :)
>
>best,
>Mishka



_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

Reply via email to