In a message dated 7/21/2002 4:03:04 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Had the Lewinski (film) photo not been properly handled after it was > rejected > by the editors and sent back to the photographer it wouldn't exist either, > and > how easy would it have been to scan through a bunch of archive CDs rather > than > wading through leaves of negs? You make a good point except this shot was submitted and accepted right away because no other photog had a shot of the event left in their (digital) archives. He had his assistants went back through thousands of slides to find a shot, any shot of her once Lewinsky was identified. Still, I get your point. I said that I didn't believe this issue was an indictment of digital per se, it was just one example that makes one wonder about how this medium will affect photography as communication. I admit that no one is yet sure, least of all me. -Brendan MacRae - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
