Many of the older Canon/Nikon shooters in the nature photography group
I'm involved with have switched to Four Thirds (micro four thirds?)
mirrorless systems.
A 150-400 lens in that system apparently has an 35mm equivalent of
300-800mm ... and costs slightly less than Canon/Nikon big glass.
Others (younger, more fit?) have been switching to Canon's full-frame
(?) mirrorless system.
I don't think Canon has yet come out with big glass for the EOS R or RF,
but one OLD guy I know (our age) is using the EF 800mm f/5.6 on an R
body using an adapter.
On 3/11/2022 9:07 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I never thought I’d say it, but at 74, I’m worn out. I don’t know how much
longer I can keep carrying big glass and a full frame camera on a walk through
the woods. Yes, my k-3 is lighter, but it’s still a lot of camera with a lens
that’s long enough to shoot wildlife.
Here’s the camera I want:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=sony%20rx10&N=0&InitialSearch=yes&sts=ma
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
