Ummm...I doubt it. I find the 500 impressive, but might be fun to compare. J
Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 22, 2018, at 5:12 AM, Alan C <[email protected]> wrote: > > *Jack Davis* jdavisf8 at comcast.net > <mailto:pdml%40pdml.net?Subject=Re%3A%20PESO%20x%202%3A%20Martial%20Eagle&In-Reply-To=%3CECC16123-2A8A-46AE-9800-4F9DC93EA3AC%40comcast.net%3E> > /Sun Jul 22 06:10:12 EDT 2018/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Nice Eagle catch and background! > J > > Thanks, Jack. The Eagle was really a bit too far away in subdued light. (The > Ellies were in bright sun). > I sat there for about 20 min. waiting for it to move off but it really took > its time eating. > > At 500mm I've tried the 1.7x AF TC on the Sigma at home. Softens the images. > Obviously not as good as the newer 1.4x optically. > > Mind you, youv'e given me an idea: Perhaps 300mm + TC will be sharper than > 500mm without? > > Alan C > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
