In general, in most cases, written text has a significant degree of
redundancy that makes it easier for quick reading and comprehension.
Whl ths txt could b understd, we prfr corrct spllng in the books.
Right? (I am talking about English.)
And it has nothing to do with "limited comprehension".
... and there are those who argue that capitalization is superfluous ...
... and those who don't care about the reader.
Sat Mar 18 15:25:29 EDT 2017 John Sessoms wrote:
OTOH, there are certainly plenty of "those of limited comprehension" out
there.
On 3/18/2017 7:46 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Nothing to do with an Oxford comma, sadly. The OC is the superfluous
comma inserted by ruffians and ne'er-do-wells, in a list of three or
more items, before the word "and" or "or" that is before the final item.
It seems to be an aid for those of limited comprehension.
On 17 March 2017 at 16:09 Morris Galloway wrote:
Ah the Oxford Comma!
'Let's eat grandmother' or 'Let's eat, grandmother' is where we have
two vastly different outcomes. I now return to invisibility.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
