Sure, but with some caveats. If you have zero movement in your scene, then you are golden. If tree branches sway in the wind, water flows, grasses move, people, etc, there will be some issues. The K-1 has some software that helps with this when it processes PS files, but the k-3 never was upgraded to reflect that. If you are photoshop savvy you can easily process the file in silkypix and then extract a single frame out of the same DNG (it saves each shot individually) and merge the two in photoshop. You can use the single frame grab to fill in the areas where movement caused error though you will of course lose the PS effect in that area. I would have no issues using pixelshift that way. Its not perfect on the k-1 either at times with moving scenes so you would likely have to do the same thing with that camera as well though you would have less to fix I think. Does that make sense?
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Collin B <[email protected]> wrote: > Zos said ... >>The K-3 II has pixel shift, better SR (1 stop better), and the astro >>tracer built in. It also lacks a pop up flash since that is where they >>put the GPS unit. Otherwise they are 100% the same really. If you >>didn't need pixel shift or GPS I would just pass myself. > > Is pixel shift usable outside of studio shooting? > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
