P.J. Alling wrote:
To be fair, the Canon has a better autofocus system with more focus
points spread over more of the frame, not to mention much better live
view focusing, faster frame rate, bigger buffer, a touch screen, (which
enables nose focus I would guess), and records video in 4K, all of which
are desirable to a lot of photographers.
Yup. The K-1 is the best camera on the market for someone who wishes
that their 35 year old K1000 was digital. Sure, it has all those
niceties like autofocus, auto exposure and such, but to really get the
best results from it, you very rarely want to rely entirely on its
automatic modes. However, if you're willing to take your time, and
carefully double check everything, it is probably the best performing
camera on the market for anything close to the cost.
For shooting action, arguably my K-3 is a much better camera, with the
faster frame rate and much larger buffer.
On 9/15/2016 7:22 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
And at $3500 it is less than twice the cost
https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-IV-versus-Pentax-K-1___1106_1075
--
Larry Colen [email protected] (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
