It's a lovely shot. I didn't mean to suggest that the 'solarisation' was an error - it's just an effect of his fur. But I do prefer this rendering as it tones down the red a little, although they are rather ginger little things
B > On 24 Jan 2016, at 20:37, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > > Did a new rendering on the squirrel pic. This is exactly as recorded: > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18177079&size=lg >> On Jan 24, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Bob W-PDML <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Both v nice. The squirrel on the right looks a bit solarised! >> >> B >> >>> On 24 Jan 2016, at 15:55, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> A couple more pics from yesterday’s trip to the nature center. The Cardinal >>> is at 630mm, the squirrels at 567mm. Both with 150-450 plus 1.4X converter, >>> f8, ISO 800. >>> >>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18177079&size=lg >>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18177081&size=lg >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
