I was wondering about that myself.... Since pixel shift does not work
with flash I'd need to make some changes to my current workflow. I rely
on flash to illuminate the subjects. Two advantages there - first the
flash freezes the subject (it is amazing how much vibration becomes
evident at high magnifications) and second because of the sheer amount
of light needed due to the light loss from the extension tubes and also
from the need to use low ISO's. I try to shoot at ISO 100 since focus
stacking also seems to stack noise as well. When I have tried to go up
to ISO 400 even, the noise in the final combined image gets to be very
noticeable.
I might try to work to resolve those issues - continuous lighting would
make set up a lot easier.
Mark
On 7/16/2015 5:30 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I would be very interested to see what difference pixel shift would
make with Mark's super macros.
Darren Addy wrote:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2015/07/14/pentax-k-3-ii-gallery-pixel-shift-resolution-goes-head-to-head-in-the-real
I had about a 24hr period where I didn't get PDML mail and I don't
think anything I sent was posted, so this is a resend. Apologies if it
is a duplicate.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
