Interesting about all the stuff about why the "I' isn't acceptable...
I just knew it wasn't because I needed to know such things for labels on photos forstock... otherwise, given who played it, I might have let it go.

I'll skip the youtube if ya dont mind

ann

On 7/15/2015 7:05 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
On 15 Jul 2015, at 22:52, ann sanfedele <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/14/2015 10:47 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Have we decided that it's an Hibiscus coulteri?
Thanks again, Ann!

J
No, we have decided it ain't - because of the skinny leaves there are jsut too 
many dammed hibiscuses On an irrelevant to photography note - I won a challenge 
against US/World and Canadian Champion Scrabble player, Joel Wapnick, some 
years back In a fairly important tourney when he tried to get away with 
HIBISCI. A rare moment in my tourney history. Didn't keep him from winning that 
game though. I have beaten him, but not in any signifigant tourneys.
Still friends though :-) ann

http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=945
Over here the dictionary that official Scrabble words come from is Chambers, 
and a Latin plural is not given, so hibiscuses is the plural in UK English too 
- and that's what is given in Chambers.

It's interesting to note, though, the confusion online about the Latin plural, 
indeed about the gender and even existence of 'hibiscus' - at least one of the 
online dictionaries claims it is 2nd declension feminine - which doesn't exist! 
All 2nd declension nouns are masculine or neuter.

My print dictionary (Collins) has hibiscum as the Latin for marsh-mallow, and 
does not have 'hibiscus' at all. Hibiscum is 2nd declension neuter, so the 
(nominative) plural is hibisca. In this form 'hibisci' exists as the genitive 
singular: 'of the marsh-mallow'.

Some of the online etymologies give 'hibiscus', which is masculine, as a later 
Latin form (presumably later than the Golden Age) but they don't say how much 
later. So it changed gender during the course of its development - a genuine 
paradigm shift. In this later form 'hibisci' is the correct Latin nominative 
plural.

So there you have it, in case anyone asks why it was disallowed.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KAfKFKBlZbM

B

P.s. I think it's H. moscheutos, which would make it a swamp marsh-mallow, and 
therefore a cross-language pleonasmic tautological redundancy.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to