I had an image from the K20D displayed on the side of a bus, at 6+ feet
by 4+ feet. You couldn't tell if it was shot with a APS-C FF or medium
format digital. Up close it was a half tone image with approximately
5/8 inch dots, pretty much billboard stuff. If that's how it's
processed it really doesn't matter how many MP over 14 you have, get
close enough and the image falls apart.
On 9/13/2014 7:53 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
If you can offer that capability to clients with your files that makes
you more competitive. This is why most pros have moved on to FF. The
K-5 was a great camera, but still not as good in terms of resolving
power as say a 5dmk2. I think the K-5 IIs is actually pretty damned
close and the K-3 possibly better with the right lens. For a lot of
what I want from photography a 645Z would make perfect sense. Except
the cost that is. :) In theory a camera like that should be able to
pay for itself fairly quickly though.
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immortality through not dying.
-- Woody Allen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
