On Sep 11, 2014, at 8:51 am, Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Fog really is a photographers friend. :) > > I totally agree. Does anyone other than me have a hard time converting a > Foggy RAW shot? > I find it takes alot more 'fiddling' than non foggy shots. > > Any secrets? No secrets from me, I found exposure far more difficult than conversion. Then a fairly simple tweak of curves in Photoshop. Luckily I'd taken a few photos beforehand so had (approximately) the right compensation already dialled in. For that first shot I had to move quickly to be in the right place when the walker was where I wanted them. In reply to Darren, I only had the 16-45 with me and I'm pretty sure that one was at 45mm. I'm not surprised that everyone seems to prefer the first one. Part of the intent of the second was to show the full row of trees and how they vary in height along the path but the effect doesn't seem as strong in the photo. Maybe it's because I normally see them from the other side. I think they were all planted at about the same time so I've no idea why they've grown like that. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
