On Mar 9, 2014, at 1:19 PM, P.J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 3/9/2014 3:55 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mar 9, 2014, at 3:59 AM, Steve Cottrell <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> For anyone reading this thread, this link will be of interest. In-depth >>>> real world experiences in a review: >>>> >>>> <http://danbaileyphoto.com/blog/the-fujifilm-x-t1-full-review-and-field-test/> >>> It sounds very intriguing, particularly after the grief that I’ve been >>> having with low light auto focus on my K-5 >> Or, for less money and complete compatibility with your existing K-5 >> lenses and accessories, there's the K-3. >> >> ;-) >> > > The K-5IIs is still available, and is getting quite affordable, with > supposedly much improved auto focus over the K-5. Face it Larry, you just > want to have a second system to complain about. I’ve got the K-5 II, and am often surprised at how annoyed I am by its shortcomings. It has sensor performance that is the stuff of science fiction. It has the best low light autofocus of any camera I’ve ever owned, better than the K-5 which was better than the D600. But because it can’t focus quickly on moving targets at 2EV or darker, and because it gets rather noisy over ISO 8000, I find myself grumbling. > > -- > A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy, > crazier. > > - H.L.Mencken > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
