Thanks Frank. It’s not a fluorescent light. It’s the incandescent pool table light, but it’s out of range and burned out. I could easily clone it out, but I like it. I think it keeps this from being just another portrait.
Paul On Feb 20, 2014, at 12:20 PM, knarf <[email protected]> wrote: > That's a lovely portrait, Paul. > > I find that fluorescent light to be very harsh and distracting. Any way it > could be burned? Maybe you want it in there as part of the "story" but I > might want to crop it out all together. > > Definitely a photo worth saving imho. > > Cheers, > frank > > On 20 February, 2014 10:02:56 AM EST, Paul Stenquist > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Finally had a chance to shoot with the K-3 in the dim light of the pool >> hall. Very pleased. The camera was able to lock focus in dark corners >> and noise level looks good at ISO 12,800. Just started processing, but >> I was immediately drawn to this host of a woman shooter sizing up her >> shot. She’s a forty-something mother of teenagers and quite attractive. >> K-3, DA* 50-135/2.8, f4 @ 1/50th, ISO 12,800, 135mm focal length. >> >> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17689333&size=lg > > “Analysis kills spontaneity.” -- Henri-Frederic Amiel > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
