On 1/4/2014 4:30 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote:
Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote:
John wrote:
I think some are still under the mistaken impression that what you
"NEED" permits you to tell me what I'm allowed to *want*.
What's interesting to me is that this nontroversy is new to digital.
Back in the days of film I don't recall anyone who expressed interest
in buying a Pentax 67 or 645 being told they they didn't need that
much resolution or wouldn't print large enough to justify it.
But that was well before the Internet and fanboyism.
Um, no it wasn't.
Pretty sure the Internet was only a dream in 1969 when the 67 was
introduced.
Yeah, but the film era lasted, for most of us, up until the early
years of the 21st century.
The film era's not over yet. I still have film loaded in several camera
bodies. Someday I'll even shoot some.
--
A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy,
crazier.
- H.L.Mencken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
