On Dec 3, 2012, at 6:39 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

> Nice shot. The k7 autofocus was comparable to that of the K5, so it sounds 
> like your k5 II is considerably better then either. The engineering emphasis 
> was reportedly on low light focusing, so your experience is in sync with 
> that. Looking forward to your take on daylight autofocus.

This is good news.  I was photographing some dancers at Dickens Fair yesterday, 
and while it didn't seem like low light to me, I was having a tough time with 
focus.  The dances were waltz, polka and other victorian dances where they 
dancers move a lot more, and faster, than they do in blues, lindy, or most of 
the time in tango.  The improved autofocus in the IIs would be even better news 
if I could afford one.

> 
> Paul
> On Dec 3, 2012, at 9:32 PM, Igor Roshchin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> I've got a chance of shooting with the new K-5 IIs over the weekend
>> at a tango festival. This means two things: low light and motion.
>> 
>> I am impressed! 
>> I haven't tried Nikon D800 or D4, but I would truly compare the 
>> experience to that I had with D700 in 2010 in a similar setting.
>> Since it's been more than 1.5 years ago, I don't remember all the
>> details, so, I am not sure if the AF performance was comparable
>> or had more missed shots.
>> 
>> One can say that D700 is more than 2 years old. 
>> It is quite possible that D800 (and quite likely D4) exceeds K-5 IIs 
>> in the capabilities, but those are in a different category price-wise
>> and size/weight-wise.

My impression is that the image quality (noise, DR etc.) of the D800 is about 
the same as the D700, it just has a lot better resolution.

>> 
>> I haven't tried the original K-5, so, I cannot compare the AF
>> performance. But, the AF is greatly improved compared to K-7.
>> And the low light performance is definitely greatly improved over K-7.
>> ISO-3200 is good (exceeds ISO-1600 and almost close to ISO-800 of K-7),
>> ISO-6400 is usable, and even ISO-12800 is acceptable at the level
>> which is probably better than ISO-3200 of K-7.
>> 
>> Here is just one example at ISO-3200:
>> http://42graphy.org/misc/tango_IR00058.jpg
>> (slight LR processing, including very slight NR).

Excellent shot.


>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Igor
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

--
Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to