Yeah, I can see I'm going to need a hood on all these lenses.
Just took a few shots with the 28-85mm -- some of them were terribly
washed out.
-- Walt
On 11/15/2012 2:59 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Walt, get a lens hood for the ones you want to increase contrast with.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Walt <[email protected]> wrote:
So far, it seems to be sharper than the 50 f/2 I got in the same lot --
though, it's highly possible that's a consequence of user error.
From what I gather, the coatings on these lenses aren't all that good. I
just wonder if bumping the in-body saturation a bit on them would be the way
to go, or just wait to bump it up in LR.
-- Walt
On 11/15/2012 11:01 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Normal lenses are the most likely lenses to be high quality optically,
even in bargain brands, 135mm is probably the next most likely. It was hard
to find a really bad one, and since they went out of favor you can find some
real bargains.
On 11/14/2012 5:17 PM, Walt wrote:
Idunno -- seems sharp enough to me.
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/8186573674/
K20D, f/6.7, 1/640 sec, ISO 500
Had to bump up the contrast just a smidge, but all in all, not too
shabby. I'd say it's worth the $50 I spent on the entire lot of lenses.
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
