On Feb 13, 2012, at 9:30 AM, Subash wrote: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:25:36 -0800 > Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The Takumar K 135/2.5 is a bargain grade lens with single coatings. I >> found it a fairly poor performer until stopped down to about f/8. The >> SMC Pentax-M 135/3.5 is the one to look for. >> >> I have the SMC Takumar 135/3.5 M42 mount lens, it is a terrific >> performer too. > > thanks Godfrey. the one i saw is not the Takumar. it is a SMC-K > 135/2.5. is it optically same (as poor as) the Takumar? > No, the SMC-K 135/2.5 has nothing in common with the k-mount takumar 135/2.5. The SMC version is very good, even wide open. I sold mine for over $200, a couple of years ago. Paul > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
