On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think the scan is probably okay. There's a lot of detail in the texture of > the photo paper. If the scan was soft, the texture wouldn't show that much > detail. I suspect the print is as soft as the scan in terms of the subject > detail. I doubt that anything better than what Bruce has done is possible > without going to extreme measures. > Paul Seems this is a picture of a picture, scanned and forwarded to me, she said the lines are in the photo she scanned. I see them once or twice a year, they live a far jaunt from us, and i'll have a look at it then. Once again thanks for all of the assistance. Dave > > >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
