On Mar 9, 2011, at 1:04 AM, Cotty wrote: > On 8/3/11, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> I find it just okay. Decent photoshop work in most cases, but the ideas >> are somewhat redundant. He does multiple variations of several basic >> concepts. The similarity becomes tedious. I also found some of the >> compositions to be lacking. All things considered, I'd give him a C-. > > I am given to understand that no PS is involved - he shoots everything > in camera.....? > > -- I don't see how that's possible. But if it is somehow done in camera, he could achieve the same effect much more easily in PhotoShop. I suppose it's possible to do some of these with multiple exposures against the same background, but not likely. For example, the woman supporting two men at the ends of her arms. If there's a way to do it in camera, it eludes me. And the result is still just okay, IMO, regardless of how it's achieved. Paul > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ---------- http://www.cottysnaps.com > _____________________________ > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
