On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 12:19 PM, Fred wrote: > > OK, Aaron, I guess I'll try to understand that concept (even though > I'm not rushing out to buy a 6x7). ;-) However, as beautiful a > camera body the 6x7 may be to some, it still is far larger in every > physical characteristic than most people would ever want or need.
Fred, you don't know what you're missing. ;) > I'm glad that you medium format guys are finding some "brotherhood" > on the PDML - I imagine that some of you may get tired of wading > through all the 35mm stuff to get to what seems relevant to a 6x7 > (or a 645). However, there is no need for any of the "small format > bashing" that's been going on. I think we've just been slightly giddy at having nearly the majority of the messages devoted to medium format for almost two whole days! The 35mm bashing has been absolutely tongue-in-cheek. There is no way that I would sell my LX or my A* 200mm f2.8, even to finance more 67 gear. Hell, after all that goofy fuss I put up, my favourite lens on the lens roll call is still a 35mm lens. ;) -Aaron - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
