On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Miserere <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for that, Bong. I also felt the K-r was a bit more solid than > the K-x. Did you use AAs or Li-Ion?
I used the Li-ion that came with it; it seems that the touted AA battery holder has to be purchased as a separate accessory. > So you'd say the K-r has better high ISO performance than the K-x? I > was told the K-r sensor is a new design, even if it shares the same > pixel count with the K-x sensor. As an after thought, maybe I should have shot both the K-r & K-x in the same setting throughout the event I was covering then I could definitely answer that question. All I can say is that it *feels* that way--is not that I would not trust the K-x to produce a similar output. > At the sizes you've posted, I can't really tell just how good those > pics are, but I'll take your word that they're clean. I'll post some big versions shortly; I was in a hurry to meet the deadline for the client so they were cookie cutter cropped in a hurry. > Is Mark as nice in real life as he seems on his blog? Cool surfer dude... Bong :-) -- Bong Manayon http://www.bong.uni.cc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
