That's the reason they make good sturdy tripods. Jack
--- On Wed, 11/10/10, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Mark Roberts <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: K-5, K-7, side-by-side at ISO 6400 > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, November 10, 2010, 7:16 AM > CheekyGeek wrote: > > >On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Yep. I'm extremely happy with the Samsung sensor > and can easily wait > >> to upgrade. If I do, it'll be because of the lower > minimum ISO of 80 > >> rather than the high ISO settings of the K-5. > > > >OK. Let's look at it on your terms: > >In a digital camera, I would argue that lower ISOs are > *primarily* > >important for the maximum Dynamic Range that they > provide. > > Not to me. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
