While my images have improved with digital, my photography has not (if that 
makes any sense). The $.25 is not as much of a concern as the difficulty 
developing and scanning film in a 150-year house with lots of dust and pet 
hair. I do like the appearance of silver halide over digital (grittiness), but 
digital is so much more convenient.

Jeffery

On Oct 25, 2010, at 10:09 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:

> Jeffery,
> I'm shooting an MZ-S along with my K-7D right now and feeling the difference.
> I don't "spray and pray" very often with the K-7D,
> but the MZ-S does encourage a more thoughtful process.
> I should probably take more photos on a routine basis.
> (I noticed on the PDML visit to Chicago,
> Boris has 2X the milage on his K-7D that I do.)
> I think digital is positive for encouraging me to try more stuff.
> With film it was always $.25+ per shot... Quite a limiter.
> Regards,  Bob S.
> 
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Jeffery Smith <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> Which is one of the reasons why I find digital a bit less satisfying than 
>> film. The impulse to "spray and pray", blasting 400 images a day and trying 
>> to find a few acceptable ones. I used to spend much more time planning a 
>> shot when there were few of them available on a roll of film.
>> 
>> Jeffery
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 24, 2010, at 8:39 PM, John Coyle wrote:
>> 
>>> IMO, Jeffery, you were right to buy it on those grounds.  It is the last
>>> Pentax 35mm film camera , and I love using it.  I've recently shot
>>> exclusively with it rather than using digital: the need to think more about
>>> each shot is a valuable discipline, I think, as well as it being such a
>>> pleasure to use.
>>> 
>>> John Coyle
>>> Brisbane, Australia
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>>> Jeffery Smith
>>> Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 6:41 AM
>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> Subject: The Film Body Nobody Talks About - late reply
>>> 
>>> I have a Pentax MZ-S, and it has never had a single frame shot with it. I
>>> bought it around the time I suspected that it would be Pentax's last film
>>> body (I have a wealth of Pentax lenses, from 20mm to 300mm). I received it,
>>> unboxed it, put a 50/1.4 on the front of it, and promptly got clobbered by
>>> Katrina, followed by Rita. It remained in a Domke bag under a ton of stuff
>>> carried from the first floor to the second floor, and got unearthed a few
>>> months ago. A lot happened over the past 5 years. I still have a lot of B&W
>>> film, so I'll probably put some fresh battteries in it and give it a maiden
>>> voyage.
>>> 
>>> Jeffery
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>> follow the directions.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to