Again, thanks for the kind words, Frank.
And, yes ... partial desaturation is a kind of gimmicky thing. But,
just for the sake of comparison, here's a link to the shot before the
desaturation. It was overall a pretty homely background, not befitting
of the poor butterfly who happened to land upon it:
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/j6NWB_5UK2iFiEVZcyYPng?feat=directlink
A creature that lovely shouldn't be photographed on muddy rocks ...
unless she happens to be a fashion model.
;-)
-- Walt
On 10/4/2010 3:12 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Walter Gilbert<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
OK ... my last PESO for the weekend. This one is a shot from the day after
I bought my K-x, taken on a trek to a nearby wildlife preserve. This
butterfly followed me around all day -- I guess it was attracted to the
color of my shirt, or my shampoo, or my sense of humor -- Idunno. But, I
managed to get several shots of it, this one being the best:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/walt_gilbert/5049770866/#/
K-x, DAL 50-200mm, f/9, ISO 400, 1/400, Program mode
I desaturated everything except blue and cyan -- and kicked those up a few
notches for dramatic effect.
Comments, critiques, and free samples of non-perishable goods are heartily
encouraged.
I'm not much for partial desaturation. I find it gimmicky and it
detracts from a photo.
But that's just me.
Still, I attempt to put my prejudices aside, and I have to say it's a
very good photo! Having had a hand at attempting to photograph
butterflies recently, I know they're not an easy catch.
cheers,
frank
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
