On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Brian Walters <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:34 -0500, "Charles Robinson" <[email protected]> > wrote: > And may I respectfully disagree with Dan. If the photographer feels > there is a specific and obvious problem with an image, I'm happy for them to > be mentioned. > It gives me something else to consider in my comments.
I don't disagree with you if the photographer is aware of an obvious and specific problem. Why have two or three people point that out instead of commenting on the other aspects of the image? In this case, however, and in two or three other recent posts, there was no obvious (or even hidden) flaw; Charles was just being overly modest. I think that can have an effect on what we expect to see, and may unjustly color what others think and say about the image. I think a poster will get better and more unbiased comments without a generalized statement about possible flaws in the photo. Remember, one man's flaw is another man's enhancement. Dan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
