On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:12 +0100, "Chris Mitchell"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> John Celio's AF 35-70/2.8 arrived and is united with the ME-F that's been
> sitting in a cupboard for years:
> http://mitch.myzen.co.uk/PDML/_IGP5615.jpg
> 
> With new batteries throughout, it all works perfectly. AF is slow and
> only
> works in good contrasty light. It's done by pressing a button on the lens
> grip. There are two buttons for when the camera is held in landscape or
> portrait. It's bulky when compared to the other M cameras, but smaller
> and
> lighter than my K7 with the 16-50/2.8, but I can see why the format never
> took off. I guess Pentax were keen to gain the accolade of introducing
> the
> first AF SLR so had to retrofit it to a modified existing body.
> 
> I've been on the lookout for the lens, ever since a friend gave me the
> ME-F
> as payment for taking some family portraits, more as a curiosity than
> anything. When John's appeared at a good price, I jumped at it. My
> daughter
> used to use the ME-F with a standard 50/1.7 lens when she was learning
> the
> ropes. It's effectively an ME Super with focus confirmation without the
> AF
> lens. One day I'll put a film in it...
> 


Yes, the ME-F should have the AF 35-70 fitted to be really 'authentic'. 
Truly a 'milestone', even if utterly impractical.  I've put a film or
two through mine and that AF lens might be fast optically but the
autofocus is excruciating.  



Cheers

Brian

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
-- 


-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Accessible with your email software
                          or over the web


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to