On 2010-07-29 13:55, Sam L wrote:
     When I try to open the jpg using "windows picture and fax viewer"
I get a blank screen and
     either "generating preview" or "drawing failed".  When I use
"microsoft office picture viewer" I just get a black screen.
     And hey ... that's odd ... when I use "internet explorer" the file
actually seems to display.  Strange!

That potentially points toward something in the file formats that aren't being interpreted consistently among the different viewers, or something that's missing that some viewers can/will default and others won't, or they try but use a default value that doesn't work with these particular files. JPG files are very sensitive to even small corruptions in the data stream due to the progressive nature of the encoding.

One way to get around it might be to open them in the program that can open them, and save them in that program, too. That might "fill in the blanks" that are causing problems for the other programs. Of course, you risk having another round of lossy-compression-degradation in the quality of the JPGs.

     Backup has been either a simple copy/paste using windows explorer
or by "syncback" which is a pretty decent
     free backup software.  File by file comparisons doesn't really
sound realistic or practical, except for maybe once a year.
     I have currently 15,000+ files.

15,000 files will take at most a few minutes to check on most modern computers using an external USB 2.0 or Firewire drive, less for an eSATA drive. And even if it takes longer than that on your computer, kick off a backup Monday night when you go to bed, and a verification Tuesday night when you go to bed. It'll be done in the morning.

     I just check my syncback software and there is a "verify" option
which I will use from not on at the very least.

   If it ain't verified, it ain't a backup.  Trusting that they were OK
may be part of what got you in this mess.

OK, I didn't make my meaning clear there. Like someone else said earlier today, the only way to verify a backup is to restore it and actually use the restored files.

Now that I think about it, this actually might be a case where it would be a useful project, but still a small enough one that I could get it done, to create some Linux shell scripts and/or Windows "batch" files to do some of these operations. Say, one to do the backup, one to do the restore, and one to test the restored files.

The easiest way for you to test your backups without writing scripts or programs would be to have another external drive that's doesn't hold anything else. Fast format that drive, copy the backed up files to it, then use a free "duplicate file finder" utility to confirm the restored files are the same as the backed up files.

--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to