A photo is worth a thousand words. This is a proof gallery I provided to a recent client:
http://www.gdgphoto.com/mcccs/ On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:09 AM, CheekyGeek <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for all the quick replies. (More opinions are still welcome). > > In the old days, our proofs were 4"x5", so it seems reasonable to me > that if they presented THAT size on a 72dpi monitor it would be the > equiv (and therefore "good enough" for the purpose). That would make > them 288x442 pixels, which is under all of the estimates given so far. > > Any thoughts? > > Darren Addy > Kearney, NE > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
