--------------------------------------------------
From: "Rick Womer"
Subject: Re: Feed Us Your Photoblog--The Solution
Well said, Bill. I would welcome more constructive commentary, as long as
it is respectful. That doesn't mean that a pile of dogshit is called a
golden egg, it just means that you don't call =the photographer= a pile of
dogshit.
Not this gets to the heart of things (Christine, I'll email you after we
have this sorted out).
What happens if the photographer normally puts pretty decent work up and for
some reason puts a turd up for our viewing pleasure?
Calling the turd a pile of excrement is all well and good, and doing it
respectfully can probably be done in French, but is one allowed to question
why the image was submitted?
Is one allowed to say: "Is this the best you can do?"
Is one allowed to pass on his disappointment in the photographer?
The Shel fiasco was more or less that.
It may have gotten jacked past that, but my recollection is that it started
out pretty much that way.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
