Hello Tanya, Being the owner of a K20D, I ended up purchasing a K-x and it is much better - especially if you don't want to heavily post process. The overall word that I have gathered from lots of sources (I had a big issue with needing to shoot about 10,000) images in a single day for a gymnastics meet in bad light (no flash allowed), that the K20D is slightly better than the K7 and the K-x is clearly better than the K20D. Being an owner of both, I can say from lots of heavy testing, that the K-x is easily the best. Between the K20D and the K7 I can't say, because I don't have both. A few feel the K-7 is better, but most I have read about seem to give a slight nod to the K20D.
So, in a nutshell, you either need to deal with heavy post processing or get a K-x. Even with post processing the K7, the K-x is better. -- Best regards, Bruce Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 2:56:39 PM, you wrote: TL> I've been finding the noise really annoying, significantly adding to my post TL> workflow as I have been shooting a fair few poorly lit interiors TL> of late for various publications. TL> I am actually thinking I might get myself a K20D to use for this purpose. I TL> wonder if the K-X would be any better? TL> Tan. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
