Thanks, Bruce. The 10-17 was at 10 mm; probably I should have gotten closer.
Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW --- On Wed, 6/9/10, Bruce Dayton <[email protected]> wrote: > #1 is nice, but I can't help but feel > the fisheye effect needs more > exaggeration - maybe even a bit closer. It just has > that inbetween > feel for me - either a little more fisheye or a little less > - I still > rather like it though. > > #2 is pretty cool - much more abstract and not a view of > the Bean > that I have seen before. > > Nice work on both. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Wednesday, June 9, 2010, 4:43:47 AM, you wrote: > > RW> Needing no introduction... > > RW> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11105069&size=lg > > RW> and > > RW> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11105075 > > RW> (K10D and DA 10-17) > > RW> Rick > > > RW> > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
