Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
----- Original Message -----
From: "paul stenquist" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Confirmed: no K30D ever. The K-7 *is* the K30D.
I think it would have been a howl.
On May 28, 2009, at 11:24 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
It definitely would have been ruff . . .
They'd br barking up the wrong tree....
----- Original Message ----
From: Gonz <[email protected]>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 8:08:49 PM
Subject: Re: Confirmed: no K30D ever. The K-7 *is* the K30D.
I'm glad they vetoed the idea, it would have dogged them forever.
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Matthew Miller <[email protected]>
wrote:
<http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/61649-there-will-no-k30.html
>
The original name for the K-7 was the K30. However, as developement
rolled
on, we realized that this camera was much more than a replacement to
the
K20D. Therefore, we decided to move to a different number.
As far as where that number came from, it is hard to say. I probably
shouldn't share this, but the original suggestion was K-9. For obvious
reasons we here in the US and our European counterparts vetoed this
idea.
Says John Carlson, Pentax Product Managerfor Imaging Systems.
--
Matthew Miller [email protected] <http://mattdm.org/
>
The Definitive Pentax P-TTL Flash Model Guide: <http://pttl.mattdm.org/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
