On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 01:17:27PM -0400, [email protected] wrote: > In a message dated 3/28/2009 1:27:26 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > Normally, I look for contrasting backgrounds, but when I noticed how > well matched the fire hydrant and the flowers were, I had to take some > shots. > > http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3424/3391131145_6515b217c7_b.jpg > > from > http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157615925062979/ > > =============== > I actually like a few others in your geso, better, Larry. > > Like this > http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/3391128101/in/set-72157615925062979/ > > and this > http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/3391946398/in/set-72157615925062979/
That's one of the interesting tradeoffs of the PESO / GESO question. It seems that artists are often the worst judges of their own work. Last week I went for a walk in the park next to my office to take a short break to clear my head. When I got home, I wasn't thrilled with any of the shots, but my workflow is to go through my photos and rate them 1-3: 1: unredeemable 2: technically bad, but if someone really likes something about the shot, it's still recognizable 3: No major problems the rating eventually go up to 4: worth posting on the web 5: worth printing Once I've thrown away the bad shot, maybe done some simple post processing, and move the totally uninspiring "meh" shots aside, I have my girlfriend rate the pictures. She went through and liked five of them enough to rate them 4 starts, including two from the "meh" folder. http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157615745581379/ > > Looking good. Thanks. > > Marnie aka Doe -- The fastest way to get your question answered on the net is to post the wrong answer. Larry Colen [email protected] http://www.red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
