Ira_
I prefer the second shot in the original... The light is great and I
think all the buildings are ugly so cropping out
the one balancing the big glitzy phallus doesn't seem necessary... I'm
also not a fan of square format - the scene you
shot could even be wider....
The light makes it... but between the pollution and the nightmarishly
(to me ) futuristic buildings there reminds me
of a poem a friend of mine wrote years ago called "beauty lurks"
wherein things one is repulsed by can still be
strikingly beautiful...
woowoo - pardon my pomposity! I'm usually just ditzy
ann
Ira Bryant wrote:
From: Christine Aguila <[email protected]>
Hi Ira: Wow, I love the 2nd one. I think it's lovely. I do have a suggestion,
but if you think I'm way off base, go ahead and ignore: Maybe crop out the
building on the right. I really love the building on the left; it's very pretty
& all the other little buildings accent the big building wonderfully, but that
building on the right distracts to my eye. Now that will give a squarish crop,
but I like square crops, but you might not. Anyway, lovely 2nd shot. Again,
just ignore if the suggestion doesn't suit you. Big cheers, Christine
Thanks for looking Christine. I do agree the building on the right is ugly. I
just thought that the picture needed to have something there to balance the
building and slope on the left. I tried it with a square crop, trying to
minimize the effect of the slope. I'm not sure if it is better, or if I am just
trading one distraction for another.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3407/3301630857_5398fc81d3_o.jpg
Ira
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.