Ira_

I prefer the second shot in the original... The light is great and I think all the buildings are ugly so cropping out the one balancing the big glitzy phallus doesn't seem necessary... I'm also not a fan of square format - the scene you
shot could even be wider....

The light makes it... but between the pollution and the nightmarishly (to me ) futuristic buildings there reminds me of a poem a friend of mine wrote years ago called "beauty lurks" wherein things one is repulsed by can still be
strikingly beautiful...

woowoo - pardon my pomposity!  I'm usually just ditzy

ann

Ira Bryant wrote:

From: Christine Aguila <[email protected]>

Hi Ira: Wow, I love the 2nd one. I think it's lovely. I do have a suggestion, but if you think I'm way off base, go ahead and ignore: Maybe crop out the building on the right. I really love the building on the left; it's very pretty & all the other little buildings accent the big building wonderfully, but that building on the right distracts to my eye. Now that will give a squarish crop, but I like square crops, but you might not. Anyway, lovely 2nd shot. Again, just ignore if the suggestion doesn't suit you. Big cheers, Christine


Thanks for looking Christine. I do agree the building on the right is ugly. I 
just thought that the picture needed to have something there to balance the 
building and slope on the left. I tried it with a square crop, trying to 
minimize the effect of the slope. I'm not sure if it is better, or if I am just 
trading one distraction for another.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3407/3301630857_5398fc81d3_o.jpg

Ira


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to